Saturday, March 6, 2010

Last Year at Marienbad

First off, from a story standpoint, I got nothing out of this movie. It was too back and forth with what was real and what was fantasy that I couldn't get a solid concept. However, I think that let me focus more on a visual standpoint rather than try to pay attention to the events.

I felt like right off the bat, the movie made it seem like you weren't supposed to see everything. It's like you're trying to take a tour but it keeps abrubtly jumping forward so you aren't getting a definite picture. We want to smoothly go through so we can look at what we want to and draw upon that but it jumps ahead regardless forcing you to look at something new before we can take in what we were looking at before. This trend continued when people are shown in the film. For short gaps, people just stop moving and we move by with no interactions or change. To me, this seemed like the jumps from before are still going on, we just see what was in the gap. Visually, we are getting to see what was in that gap, but it makes it so that even though we now get to see it, we still learn nothing from it.

Similar jumps take place while X is telling his stories of last year to A. We move around between past, present, and fantasy to the point that we aren't sure which is which. It distances us from reality to where we are trying to find our way back to what is real while it constantly pushes us farther from it. At one scene, the film tries to flip from night where everyone is wearing dark outfits to a completely white room with A in a white dress. The scene then flips back to dark and begins to flash between the two. It's almost as if the change is such a drastic contrast that it splits the scene into both reality and fantasy at the same time and it can't handle the change. It's one of the few times it forcefully pulls us back into view of which part is the present (at least what we think of as the present, to be honest, who the hell knows what's real or not).

One particular thing that I took note of was the game that M played throughout the movie. Every time the game is played, it's with different objects and though how things are taken out of the rows, M always ends up winning. I saw it as a symbolic representation of X's telling of the story. Though the time and place of the film is constantly switching, the story remains the same. Even when A asks questions like who and where, X just remarks it doesn't matter. Similar to how the details of the game don't matter, the outcome of both stays the same regardless of the variations.

Overall, it was complicated but it was entertaining in it's own way. It twists and turns making what might be a simple telling of a story into a complex "faux reality". As in the reading, the film gives X, or maybe A depending on how you view it, a very solipsistic view. We aren't sure what is real except for the single character themself. For all we know, nothing but that character is real and everything else is just a fantasy of the character. I'm sure everyone gets something different from this film depending on how they think of everything. For me, though I did enjoy it for the most part, was just a gigantic "What?"

6 comments:

  1. Trying to make sense of this movie through linear plot is practically impossible. The form challenges the traditional narrative. You're observations are interesting about all the "jumps," distancing us from seeing the entire truth, if it even exists. I think you made some good observations and if you try to analyze further just through visual observations you might form a greater understanding of this film if you are still feeling a little lost in it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I also thought the movie was very back and fourth and was hard to pay attention to. It is interesting what you say about all the jumps, especially about the truth and if it even exists. I thought it was interesting that you mentioned the game. It's funny how M does always win, no matter what they play with. I like what you said about the details of the game not mattering, as well as X always saying it doesn't matter.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I love your outlook on past, present, and fantasy in relation to the jumpshots. We truly never know which is which. It's true in that this cinema technique distances us from reality to where we are "trying to find our way back to what is real while it constantly pushes us farther from it." Great observation! I also loved your comparison between the game and M always winning. The outcome is always the same no matter how the game is played similar to X's telling of his story.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I can't agree with you more about the movie being a giant "What?" It was hard to follow, but like you said that gives us more opportunity to pay more attention visually. I thought the game was interesting and it was a relief to have something constant in all of the "jumps" from past to present.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I really like the way you describe the game, how no matter what M always wins. It brought to mind a famous saying about how a person is insane if they repeat the same action and expect a different result, and I think that can be applied to the game in two ways. X keeps playing with M but the result is always the same. The game plays out differently but in the end M wins, so it's different actions producing the same result. Another way to look at it is that he keeps playing the same game against the same person and losing, but he keeps playing trying to not lose. I'm not sure where I want to go with this, but thanks for giving me the idea.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree with stopmakingsense. You have all the pieces here for a really interesting analysis, based on our own observations---especially your very good point about how the movie reveals but obscures at the same time. It never really lets us see the whole picture or the whole truth, even with all the deep focus and hyper-sharp contrasts and constantly recurring images. It's oddly like Citizen Kane that way.

    Your instinct to just watch the visuals and not worry about plot is a good one--don't worry about your own confusion--that's part of the experience with these movies. Just go with what you see and connect the pieces that you see, and toss in the concepts from the reading, and you'll be fine.

    ReplyDelete